Excerpts from “Smoking Cessation and Hypnosis:

A Comparative Review of the Effectiveness of Hypnosis, an Advanced Method of Hypnosis, and Other Interventions Used for the Cessation of Smoking”

by Michael O' Driscoll, B.Sc., M.Sc. (Oxon)

This research paper presents some of the findings from a study looking at all methods of smoking cessation, including standard hypnotherapy techniques, and compares those to a specially developed, advanced method of hypnotherapy for smoking cessation.

High quit rates for hypnosis compared to other methods

A larger meta-analysis of research into hypnosis to aid smoking cessation (Chockalingam and Schmidt 1992, 48 studies, 6,020 subjects) found that the average quit rate for those using hypnosis was 36%, making hypnosis the most effective method found in this review, with the exception of a program which encouraged pulmonary and cardiac patients to quit smoking using advice from their doctor; (such subjects are obviously atypical as they have life-threatening illnesses which are aggravated by smoking and therefore these people have very strong incentives to quit).


Table 1.
Effectiveness of different types of intervention to achieve smoking cessation
(adapted from data in Chockalingam and Schmidt, 1992)


Type of intervention

% who quit smoking

no. of subjects

no. of trials

 

Advice (cardiac patients)

42

4553

34

Hypnosis

36

6020

48

Miscellaneous

35

1400

10

Advice (pulmonary patients)

34

1661

17

Smoke aversion

31

2557

103

Group withdrawal clinics

30

11580

46

Acupuncture

30

2992

19

Instructional methods in workplace

30

976

13

Other aversive techniques

27

3926

178

5 day plans

26

7828

25

Aversive methods in

25

1041

26

Educational (health promotion initiatives)

24

3352

27

Medication

18

6810

29

Physician interventions (more than advice)

18

3486

16

Nicotine chewing gum

16

4866

40

Self-care (self-help)

15

3585

24

Physician advice

7

7190

17

Law and Tang (1995) looked at 10 randomized trials, carried out between 1975 and 1988, of hypnosis in smoking cessation. They found that the effect of hypnosis was highly statistically significant. The research they examined involved 646 subjects and cessation rates at 6 months post-treatment ranged from 10% to 38% (the average figure was 24%).

Table 2. Effectiveness of different types of intervention to achieve smoking cessation (adapted from data in Law and Tang, 1995)

Type of intervention

% who quit smoking

no. of subjects

no. of trials

Supportive group session (heart attack survivors)

36

223

1

Hypnosis

24

646

10

Supportive group session (healthy men in high risk for heart attack group)

21

13205

4

Nicotine patch (self-referral)

13

2020

10

Nicotine gum (self-referral

11

3460

13

Supportive group session (in pregnancy)

8

4738

10

Advice from GP (additional sessions)

5

6466

10

Gradual reduction in smoking

5

630

8

Nicotine patch (GP initiated treatment)

4

2597

4

Nicotine gum (GP initiated treatment)

3

7146

15

Acupuncture

3

2759

8

Advice from GP (one-off)

2

14438

17

Supportive group session

2

2059

8

Advice from nurses in health promotion clinics

1

3369

2

Table 2 (above) shows that the meta-analysis of Law and Tang confirms, to a large extent, the meta-analysis of Chockalingam and Schmidt (1992); in both cases hypnosis appears as the most effective form of intervention to achieve smoking cessation, with the exception of groups who are highly motiviated to quit for medical reasons, such as those with existing heart or pulmonary problems.

A more recent study, by Ahijevych, et al. (2000), produced a similar overall figure for the success of hypnosis. This study looked at a randomly selected sample of 2,810 smokers who participated in single-session, group hypnotherapy smoking cessation programs sponsored by the American Lung Association of Ohio. A randomly selected sample of 452 participants completed telephone interviews 5 to 15 months after attending a treatment session. 22 percent of participants reported not smoking during the month prior to the interview.

Tailored Hypnosis—Taking It to the Next Level

The results discussed so far indicate that when the bulk of random trials are considered, hypnosis is shown to be the most effective intervention for achieving smoking cessation. Yet this is only half the story—many of the trials discussed so far have used very brief sessions, using standardized hypnosis techniques, and many have, in fact, taken place in group sessions (making it difficult to tailor to each individual's needs) and have not necessarily been carried out by expert practitioners of hypnosis. If, under these circumstances, hypnosis can achieve such positive outcomes in terms of enabling smokers to quit, then what might be achieved using programs of hypnosis which are carried out by expert hypnotists and are tailored to the needs of the individual who wants to stop smoking?

Nuland and Field (1970) found an improvement rate of 60% in treating smokers with hypnosis. The increased effectiveness was achieved by a more personalized approach, including feedback (under hypnosis) of the client's own personal reasons for quitting. These researchers also employed a technique of having the client maintain contact by telephone between treatments and utilized self-hypnosis in addition.

Von Dedenroth (1968) devised an innovative unique approach which appears to have been extremely successful. He began by inquiring how long the individual had smoked, whether they recalled why they had begun, whether they had ever tried to stop smoking, why they wanted to stop smoking at this particular point in time, what benefit, if any, they felt that they derived from smoking, at what specific times they felt the need most strongly (after meals, before breakfast, etc.), and finally he asked them how many cigarettes they smoked. Von Dedenroth believed that answering these questions not only tended to increase rapport but also revealed, at least in part, the smoker's own feelings regarding his smoking and his reasons for wanting to give up the habit. The therapy proper did not begin until the second session, and at this time the smoker was told that 'Q Day' or 'Quitting Day' would be 21 days from that point. The smoker was also told to change his favorite brand of cigarettes and resolve to never smoke that brand again. The smoker is then told that they are not to smoke at all:

1.   Before breakfast

2.   For 30 minutes after each meal

3.   For 30 minutes before retiring

The smoker was told that, at the times mentioned above, he was to get into the habit of going to the bathroom, gargling with mouthwash and cleaning his teeth. He should have a glass of fruit juice upon awakening and he was told to notice the fresh feeling in his mouth in the morning and following each of these routines. After his breakfast, he was to clean his teeth again and use the mouthwash, paying close attention to the clean feeling in his mouth. Thirty minutes later he was allowed to have a cigarette, but not before. This tended to break the association between the taste of food and the inevitable cigarette that usually followed a meal. He was also told to get a small notebook to carry with him, and to write down, from time to time, his reasons for giving up smoking (physical, financial and personal). Then a trance state was induced and the above suggestions, given in the waking state, were repeated and consequently greatly reinforced. Following the trance, the patient was encouraged to ask questions, and the next appointment was arranged.

The third session occurred around one week later (and a week before 'Q day'), In this session the smoker was told that he should not drink alcohol at all, or at least to drink alcohol only with meals, with the intention of breaking the association between alcohol and smoking. A trance state was again induced and all the previous instructions reinforced. It was also suggested that smoking will no longer be enjoyable. In particular the smoker was told that the first puff of a cigarette may be enjoyable, the second less enjoyable, and the third may possibly irritate the nose, throat or chest. The aim of this is that by the time 'Q Day' arrives the smoker may only be taking a few puffs of each cigarette a day; as the number of cigarettes smoked, and the amount of each of those cigarettes smoked, has declined, then it should be less painful for the individual to quit.

Von Dedenroth believed that the fact that the individual is able to reduce and stop smoking (with the aid of hypnosis) gives the individual a great feeling of self-accomplishment. 'Q day' begins with the induction of a trance state and it is emphasized continually to the smoker that bad habits have been replaced by good ones, and that for several weeks cigarettes have become more and more unpleasant.

Von Dedenroth found that his use of hypnosis enabled 94% of 1000 subjects to stop smoking (when checked at 18 months).

Practice Builders Study (2000)

This research was carried out on 300 subjects (beginning in January 2000 and continuing until March 2002) who responded to an advertisement. A 'blind trial' technique was used—subjects were not aware that they were taking part in a research project although they all checked a box on their intake forms saying that they understood that the hypnotist's methods were always being measured tested and improved, and that results would be collated and studied. Client confidentiality was assured so that their data could be used but not their names, and these subjects were randomly allocated to receive either 'standard' hypnotherapy or a special formulation of hypnotherapy which Practice Builders has termed 'advanced therapy.' 51% of respondents were male and 49% female; the median age of all subjects was 44 years.

No respondents had previous experience of hypnosis—51% of subjects had tried nicotine patches, 14% had tried nicotine gum, 7% had tried acupuncture, 6% had tried using a nicotine inhaler and 30% had previously tried to quit using will power alone. 11% of subjects had not previously tried to quit smoking. For all subjects:


The client was interviewed to make sure that they wanted to stop smoking for their own reasons, and were not being pressured into it by someone else (doctor, loved one, etc.).

The price was kept high to establish commitment, and to avoid people who were casually or speculatively trying hypnosis (as opposed to those who have some commitment, confidence or belief that hypnosis would help them to stop smoking).

Before the actual hypnosis, the client (or subject) is asked a series of questions about their smoking habit and their beliefs. They are asked, for example:

* "What fears do you have about stopping?"
* "What do you know about hypnosis?"

Hypnosis was then fully explained to the client, as well as how the conscious and the subconscious mind work, and any myths debunked (such as, you cannot make someone do something they don't want to do, hypnosis is not sleep or unconsciousness, you will be aware of everything that is going on and will remember everything that happened in hypnosis after the session, you can stop the session at any time, etc.). This is called the "pre-talk."

A hypnotic contract is then entered into, in which the client agrees to go along with all techniques and to accept all the suggestions that are for their benefit.

For subjects treated with the standard technique, a basic stop smoking technique is used. This type of standard technique doesn't allow for much in the way of personalizing a session, as it is the same for every client. The wording of some of the best basic techniques incorporates hypnotic language patterns (Neuro-Linguistic Programming). The client is then emerged.

For subjects treated with the advanced technique, hypnosis is induced using a progressive test induction tailored to the client. Ideo-motor techniques are used to gain subconscious communication. The client's own motivations, Meta programs, and values are utilized in the session using a combination of metaphor and suggestion. NLP sub-modality and anchoring techniques are used according to the client's processing style. At the end of the session, the client is emerged from hypnosis and the change is tested, then future-paced and ratified.

 

Findings

Quit rates were established through telephone interviews 1 month and 6 months after the first session of treatment.

Of those who received 'advanced therapy,' 95% had quit smoking after 1 session. The remaining 5% received a second session of treatment leading to a further 1.3% of the group quitting smoking. In total therefore, at 6 months, 97% of those who received 'advanced therapy' had quit smoking.

Of those who received 'standard therapy,' 51% quit smoking after one session and a further 6% quit after a second session—a total of 57% had quit smoking at 6 months.

Those who were still smoking at 6 months did not differ from those who had successfully quit in terms of gender, age or therapies previously tried. These results mean that for both standard treatments and the 'advanced treatment,' quit rates are extraordinarily high and well above what has hitherto been reported in the literature. Results for both treatments were significant at the 0.001 level (chi-square).

Outcomes for the 'advanced therapy' are considerably higher than any findings previously reported in the literature. In addition, the success rate achieved using the standard technique was considerably higher than expected and this may be due to the fact that the elements that the standard treatment and 'advanced treatment' have in common have powerful effects on outcomes.


References/Bibliography

Public health focus: Effectiveness of smoking-control strategies-United States (1992).

   MMWR Morb.Mortal.Wklv.Rep. 41, 645-7, 653.

Abbot, N. C, Stead, L. F., White, A. R., Barnes, J., & Ernst, E. (2000). Hypnotherapy for

     Smoking Cessation. Cochrane. Data base. Syst. Rev. CD001008.

Agee, L. L. (1983). Treatment procedures using hypnosis in smoking cessation

   programs: Areview of the literature. J.Am.Soc.Psychosom.Dent.Med. 30, 111-126.

Ahijevych, K., Yerardi, R., & Nedilsky, N. (2000). Descriptive outcomes of the American

    Lung Association of Ohio hypnotherapy smoking cessation program. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hv

    Dn., 48. 374-387.

Baer, L., Carey, R. J., Jr., & Meminger, S. R. (1986). Hypnosis for smoking cessation: A

    clinical follow-up. Int.J.Psychosom., 33, 13-16.

Barber, J. (2001). Freedom from smoking: integrating hypnotic methods and rapid smoking

    to facilitate smoking cessation. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hypn., 49, 257-266.

Bayot, A., Capafons, A., & Cardena, E. (1997). Emotional self-regulation therapy: A new

    and efficacious treatment for smoking. Am.J.CIin.Hypn., 40, 146-156.

Bello, S. (1991). [Treatment of smoking]. Rev.Med.Chil.. 119, 701-708.

Bjornson, W., Rand, C., Connett, J. E., Lindgren, P., Nides, M., Pope, F., Buist, A. S.,

    Hoppe-Ryan, C., & O'Hara, P. (1995). Gender differences in smoking cessation after 3

    years in the Lung Health Study. Am.J.Public Health, 85, 223-230.

Brian, R. K. (1992). Hypnosis. J.R.Soc.Health, 112, 312.

Byrne, D. G. & Whyte, H. M. (1987). The efficacy of community-based smoking cessation

    strategies: A long-term follow-up study. IntJ.Addict., 22, 791-801.

Capafons, A. & Amigo, S. (1995). Emotional self-regulation therapy for smoking reduction:

    Description and initial empirical data. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hypn., 43, 7-19.

Cepeda-Benito, A. (1993). Meta-analytical review of the efficacy of nicotine chewing gum in

   smoking treatment programs. J.Cons.&Clin.Psy., 61, 822-830.

Covino, N. A. & Bottari, M. (2001). Hypnosis, behavioral theory, and smoking cessation.

   J.Dent.Educ. 65, 340-347.

Crasilneck, H. B. & Hall, J. A. (1968). The use of hypnosis in controlling cigarette

   smoking. South.Med.J.. 61. 999-1002.

Crasilneck, H. B. (1990). Hypnotic techniques for smoking control and psychogenic

    impotence. AmJ.CIin.Hvpn., 32, 147-153.

Curry, S. J. (1993). Self-Help Interventions for Smoking Cessation. J.Cons.&Clin.Psych.,

    61, 790-803.

Department of Public Health & Policy (UK) (1992). Smoking Cessation Interventions. (PHP

   Departmental Publication ed.) (Vol. 6, 1992).

Dick, B. O. (1993). Hypnotism: Curse or cure? (October 1992). J.R.Soc.Health. 113, 50.

Durcan, M. J., White, J., Jorenby, D. E., Fiore, M. C., Rennard, S. I., Leischow, S. 1,

   Nides,M. A., Ascher, J. A., & Johnston, J. A. (2002). Impact of prior nicotine

   replacement therapy on smoking cessation efficacy. Am. J. Health Behav., 26, 213-220.


Frank, R. G., Umlauf, R. L, Wonderlich, S. A., & Ashkanazi, G. S. (1986). Hypnosis and

   behavioral treatment in a worksite smoking cessation program. Addict.Behav., 11,

   59-62.

Frederick, C. & McNeal, S. (1993). From strength to strength: "Iinner strength" with

   immature ego states. AmJ.CIin.Hypn., 35, 250-256.

Gonzales, D. H., Nides, M. A., Ferry, L. H., Kustra, R. P., Jamerson, B. D., Segall, N.,

 Herrero, L. A., Krishen, A., Sweeney, A., Buaron, K., & Metz, A. (2001). Bupropion SR

   as an aid to smoking cessation in smokers treated previously with bupropion: A

   randomized placebo-controlled study. Clin.Pharmacol.Ther.. 69, 438-444.

German, A. (1992). Another perspective on hypnotism. J.R.Soc.Health, 112, 312.

Gravitz, M. A. (1988). Early uses of hypnosis in smoking cessation and dietary

   management: An historical note. AmJ.CIin.Hypn., 31, 68-69.

Green, J. P. & Lynn, S. J. (2000). Hypnosis and suggestion-based approaches to

   smoking cessation: An examination of the evidence. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hypn., 48, 195-224.

Hall, J. A. & Crasilneck, H. B. (1970). Development of a hypnotic technique for treating

   chronic cigarette smoking. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hypn., 18, 283-289.

Hall, J. A. & Crasilneck, H. B. (1978). Hypnosis. JAMA, 239, 760-761.

Haustein, K. O. (2000). Pharmacotherapy of nicotine dependence. Int.J.CIin.Pharmacol.

   Ther.. 38, 273-290.

Haxby, D. G. (1995). Treatment of nicotine dependence. AmJ.HealthSyst.Pharm., 52,

   265-281.

Hays, J. T., Croghan, I. T., Schroeder, D. R., Offord, K. P., Hurt, R. D., Wolter, T. D.,

   Nides,M. A., & Davidson, M. (1999). Over-the-counter nicotine patch therapy for   

   smoking cessation: Results from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and  

   open label trials. Am.J.Public Health, 89, 1701-1707.

Hempstead, J. S. (2001). Clinical hypnotherapy for smoking cessation. Prof.Nurse, 17,

    265.

Holroyd, J. (1991). The uncertain relationship between hypnotizability and smoking

    treatment outcome. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hvpn., 39, 93-102.

Horwitz, M. B., Hindi-Alexander, M., & Wagner, T. J. (1985). Psychosocial mediators of

   abstinence, relapse, and continued smoking: A one-year follow-up of a minimal

  intervention. Addict.Behav., 10, 29-39.

Hughes, J. A., Sanders, L. D., Dunne, J. A., Tarpey, J., & Vickers, M. D. (1994). 

   Reducingsmoking: The effect of suggestion during general anaesthesia on

   postoperative smoking habits. Anaesthesia, 49, 126-128.

Hyman, G. J., Stanley, R. O., Burrows, G. D., & Home, D. J. (1986). Treatment

   effectiveness of hypnosis and behaviour therapy in smoking cessation: A methodological

   refinement. Addict.Behav., 11, 355-365.

Jamerson, B. D., Nides, M., Jorenby, D. E., Donahue, R., Garrett, P., Johnston, J. A.,

   Fiore,M. C, Rennard, S. I., & Leischow, S. J. (2001). Late-term smoking cessation

   despiteinitial failure: An evaluation of bupropion sustained release, nicotine patch,

   combinationtherapy, and placebo. Clin.Ther., 23, 744-752.

Janik, A. J. (1993). Hypnotism: Curse or cure? (October 1992). J.R.Soc.Health, 113, 50.

Jeffrey, L. K. & Jeffrey, T. B. (1988). Exclusion therapy in smoking cessation: A brief

   communication. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hypn., 36, 70-74.

Jeffrey, T. B., Jeffrey, L. K., Greuling, J. W., & Gentry, W. R. (1985). Evaluation of a brief

   group treatment package including hypnotic induction for maintenance of smoking

   cessation: A brief communication. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hvpn., 33, 95-98.

Johnson, D. L. & Karkut, R. T. (1994). Performance by gender in a stop-smoking program

   combining hypnosis and aversion. Psychol.Rep., 75, 851-857.

Jorenby, D. E., Leischow, S. J., Nides, M. A., Rennard, S. L, Johnston, J. A., Hughes,

   A. R.,Smith, S. S., Muramoto, M. L., Daughton, D. M., Doan, K., Fiore, M. C, & Baker,

   T. B.(1999). A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both

   forsmoking cessation. N.Engl.J.Med., 340, 685-691.

Kaufert, J. M., Rabkin, S. W., Syrotuik, J., Boyko, E., & Shane, F. (1986). Health beliefs

   aspredictors of success of alternate modalities of smoking cessation: Results of a   

   controlledtrial. J.Behav.Med., 9, 475-489.

Kinnunen, T. (2001). Integrating hypnosis into a comprehensive smoking cessation

   intervention: Comments on past and present studies. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hypn., 49, 267-271.

Kline, M. V. & Under, M. (1969). Psychodynamic factors in the experimental investigation

   of hypnotically induced emotions with particular reference to blood glucose

   measurements.J.Psychol., 71, 21-25.

Kline, M. V. (1970). The use of extended group hypnotherapy sessions in controlling

   cigarette habituation. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hypn., 18, 270-282.

Kline, M. V. (1971). Research in hypnotherapy: Studies in behavior organization.

   Bibl.Psychiatr., 147, 67-87.

Kline, M. V. (1972). The production of antisocial behavior through hypnosis: New clinical

   data. IntJ.CIin.Exp.Hypn., 20, 80-94.

Kline, M. V. (1979). Hypnosis with specific relation to biofeedback and behavior therapy:

   Theoretical and clinical considerations. Psychother.Psychosom., 31, 294-300.

Lambe, R., Osier, C., & Franks, P. (1986). A randomized controlled trial of hypnotherapy

   forsmoking cessation. J.Fam.Pract., 22, 61-65.

Lando, H. A. (1996). Smoking cessation products and programs. Alaska Med., 38, 65-68.

Law, M. & Tang, J. L. (1995). An analysis of the effectiveness of interventions intended to

   help people stop smoking. Arch.Intern.Med., 155, 1933-1941.

Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, L, Barabasz, A., Cardena, E., & Patterson, D. (2000). Hypnosis as an

   empirically supported clinical intervention: The state of the evidence and a look to the

   future. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hvpn.. 48, 239-259.

Lynn, S. J. & Shindler, K. (2002). The role of hypnotizability assessment in treatment.

   Am.J.CIin.Hvpn., 44. 185-197.

Molimard, M. & Hirsch, A. (1990). [Methods of stopping smoking]. Rev.Mal Respir., 7, 307-

   312.

Murray, R. P., Bailey, W. C., Daniels, K., Bjornson, W. M., Kurnow, K., Connett, J. E.,

   Nides,M. A., & Kiley, J. P. (1996). Safety of nicotine polacrilex gum used by 3,094    

   participantsin the Lung Health Study. Lung Health Study Research Group. Chest., 109,

   438-445.

Murray, R. P., Nides, M. A., Istvan, J. A., & Daniels, K. (1998). Levels of cotinine

   associated with long-term ad-libitum nicotine polacrilex use in a clinical trial.

   Addict.Behav., 23, 529-535.

Murray, R. P., Anthonisen, N. R., Connett, J. E., Wise, R. A., Lindgren, P. G., Greene,

   P. G. & Nides, M. A. (1998). Effects of multiple attempts to quit smoking and relapses to

   smoking on pulmonary function. Lung Health Study Research Group. J.CIin.EpidemioL

   51, 1317-1326.

Myles, P. S. (1992). Cessation of smoking following tape suggestion under anesthesia.

   Anaesth.IntensiveCare, 20, 540-541.

Myles, P. S., Hendrata, M., Layher, Y., Williams, N. J., Hall, J. L, Moloney, J. T., &

   Powell, J. (1996). Double-blind, randomized trial of cessation of smoking after audiotape

   suggestionduring anesthesia. Br.J.Anaesth., 76, 694-698.

Neufeld, V. & Lynn, S. J. (1988). A single-session group self-hypnosis smoking cessation

   treatment: A brief communication. Int.J.CIin.Exp.Hypn., 36, 75-79.

Nides, M., Rand, C., Doice, J., Murray, R., O'Hara, P., Voelker, H., & Connett, J. (1994).

   Weight gain as a function of smoking cessation and 2-mg nicotine gum use among

   middle-aged smokers with mild lung impairment in the first 2 years of the Lung Health

   Study. Health Psvchol.. 13, 354-361.

Nides, M. A., Tashkin, D. P., Simmons, M. S., Wise, R. A., Li, V. C., & Rand, C. S. (1993).

   Improving inhaler adherence in a clinical trial through the use of the nebulizer chronolog.

   Chest., 104, 501-507.

Nides, M. A., Rakos, R. F., Gonzales, D., Murray, R. P., Tashkin, D. P., Bjornson-

   Benson, W. M., Lindgren, P., & Connett, J. E. (1995). Predictors of initial smoking  

   cessation and relapse through the first 2 years of the Lung Health Study. J.Consult

   Clin.Psvchol., 63, 60-69.

Nuland, W. and Field P. B. (1970). Smoking and Hypnosis. IntJ.CIin.Exp.Hypn.,      

   18, 290-306.

Page, R. A. (1999). Identifying hypnotic sequelae: The problem of attribution. Am.J.

   CIin.Hvpn., 41, 316-318.

Parameswaran, P. G. (2001). Try hypnotherapy and acupuncture. Tex.Med., 97, 9-10.

Rabkin, S. W., Boyko, E., Shane, F., & Kaufert, J. (1984). A randomized trial comparing

   smoking cessation programs utilizing behaviour modification, health education or

   hypnosis. Addict.Behav., 9, 157-173.

Schoenberger, N. E. (2000). Research on hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive-behavioral

   psychotherapy. IntJ.CIin.Exp.Hypn., 48, 154-169.

Schwartz, J. L. (1979). Review and evaluation of methods of smoking cessation, 1969-77.

   Summary of a monograph. Public Health Rep.. 94, 558-563.

Schwartz, J. L. (1991). Methods for smoking cessation. Clin.Chest.Ned.. 12, 737-753.

Shewchuk, L. A. (1976). Smoking cessation programs of the American Health Foundation.

   Prev.Med., 5, 454-474.

Shewchuk, L. A., Dubren, R., Burton, D., Forman, M., Clark, R. R., & Jaffin, A. R. (1977).

   Preliminary observations on an intervention program for heavy smokers. Int.J.Addict.. 12,

   323-336.

Shiffman, S. (1993). Smoking Cessation Treatment: Any Progress? J.Consult.andClin.

   Psych. 61, 718-722.

Simon, E. P. & James, L. C. (1999). Clinical applications of hypnotherapy in a medical

   setting. Hawaii Med.J.. 58, 344-347.

Sorensen, G., Beder, B., Prible, C. R., & Pinney, J. (1995). Reducing smoking at the

   workplace: Implementing a smoking ban and hypnotherapy. J.Occup.Environ.Med., 37,

   453-460.

Spiegel, D., Frischholz, E. J., Fleiss, J. L., & Spiegel, H. (1993). Predictors of smoking

   abstinence following a single-session restructuring intervention with self-hypnosis.

   Am.J.Psychiatry. 150, 1090-1097.

Stanton, H. E. (1991). Smoking cessation in a single session: An update. Int.J.Psychosom.,

   38, 84-88.

Sykes, V. C. (1992). Hypnosis. J.R.Soc.Health. 112, 312.

Tashkin, D., Kanner, R., Bailey, W., Buist, S., Anderson, P., Nides, M., Gonzales, D.,

   Dozier,G., Patel, M. K., & Jamerson, B. (2001). Smoking cessation in patients with chronic

   obstructive pulmonary disease: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.

   Lancet, 357, 1571-1575.

Tonnesen, P. & Wennike, P. (1999). [Hypnosis for smoking cessation]. Uaeskr.Laeqer. 161,

  4270-4272.

Tori, C. D. (1978). A smoking satiation procedure with reduced medical risk. J.CIin.Psvchol.,

   34, 574-577.

Valbo, A. & Eide, T. (1996). Smoking cessation in pregnancy: The effect of hypnosis in a

  randomized study. Addict.Behav., 21, 29-35.

Viswesvaran, C. & Schmidt, F. L. (August 1992). A meta-analytic comparison of the   

   effectivenessof smoking cessation methods. J.Applied Psvch., 77, 554-561.

Von Dedenroth, T. E. (1968). The use of hypnosis in 1000 cases of "tobaccomaniacs."

 Am.J.CIin.Hypn., 10, 194-197.

Wagner, T. J., Hindi-Alexander, M., & Horwitz, M. B. (1983). A one-year follow-up study of

   the Damon Group Hypnosis Smoking Cessation Program. J.Okla.StateMed.Assoc., 76,

   414-417.

Wick, E., Sigman, R., & Kline, M. V. (1971). Hypnotherapy and therapeutic education in the

  treatment of obesity: Differential treatment factors. Psvchiatr.Q., 45, 234-254.

Williams, J. M. & Hall, D. W. (1988). Use of single session hypnosis for smoking cessation.

   Addict.Behav., 13, 205-208.

Wong, M. & Burrows, G. (1995). Clinical hypnosis. Aust.Fam.Physician, 24, 778-81, 783.

Rigotti, N. (1997). Efficacy of a Smoking Cessation Program for Hospital. Arch.Intern.Med..

   157, 2653-2660.

1. Combined results were statistically significant at the .001 level, meaning that there is less than a one in a thousand chance that these results happened by chance.